A Rose is Still a Rose No Matter What You Choose to Call It: “Admiralty Action” for Salvage is Still a Claim for Salvage

Bynum v. Ingram Barge Co., (2023 WL 2733447; 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 7708 * (No. 22-20372, 5th Cir. Mar. 31, 2023, per curiam)

            Bynum filed a claim in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking a salvage award from Ingram Barge Co. The trial judge dismissed the claim as time barred and applied the 2-year statute of limitations for salvage awards. 46 U.S.C. § 80107(c) prescribes that an award for salvage must be brought within 2 years after the “aid or salvage services were given.”[1]

            Bynum appealed arguing that the claim was “an admiralty action for salvage” and not a “civil action for salvage.”[2] This distinction did not hold water with the appellate panel which noted in the pithy per curiam opinion that the claimant “confuses jurisdiction with action.”[3] It is civil action filed within the court’s admiralty jurisdiction.[4] The claim is barred by the statute of limitations.


[1] 2023 WL 2733447 at *1; quoting 46 U.S.C. § 80107(c).

[2] 202 WL 2733447 at *1.

[3] Id.

[4] Id. 

The Current Loyola Maritime Law Journal

The Current is the blog of the Loyola New Orleans Maritime Law Journal, where we post updates to keep our readers up to date about new decisions in maritime law. We also post news about the Journal and its' members.

Previous
Previous

Trial Court Dismisses Punitive Damage Claim in Allision Case

Next
Next

Ergonomics Expert Testimony Inadmissible: M&C Claim Dismissed - Spinal Cord Stimulator is Palliative, not Curative Care